Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/11/1969
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hall v. Hall
Citations
- 257 A.2d 269
- 215 Pa. Super. 24
- 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- doctrine of estoppel precluded husband from using blood-grouping tests to establish nonpater-nity where child was acknowledged as husband’s in separation agreement and paternity was not questioned until one year following separation
- where husband acknowledged child born during coverture as his own and provided for child’s support in separation agreement he was estopped from later denying paternity
- where child was conceived and born while husband and wife were living together and where, upon separation, husband acknowledged the child as his daughter, provided for her future support, and made extensive arrangements for visitation, husband was estopped from denying paternity
- where child was conceived and born while husband and wife were living together and where, upon separation, husband acknowledged the child as his daughter, provided for her future support, and made extensive arrangements for visitation, husband was estopped from denying paternity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Weight, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael K.T. v. Tina L.T.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 167×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 96×
- In Re Adoption of YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-20· cited 46×
- Kohler v. BleemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-06· cited 38×
- Matter of MontenegroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-17· cited 38×
- Watts v. WattsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-04-30· cited 32×
- H.P.A. v. S.C.A.Alaska Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 28×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coburn v. CoburnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-03· cited 24×
- Jones v. TrojakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-29· cited 23×
- Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2009-10-13· cited 6×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Meta v. CinelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-06-12· cited 6×
- Crago v. KinzieHarrison County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-06-01· cited 5×
- Grassmyer v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-06· cited 4×
- Hpa v. ScaAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-08-09
- Commonwealth v. MixellCumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1975-12-15
- DeFinis v. DeFinisBucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-06-05
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1971-06-08
- Commonwealth ex rel. Perrine v. PerrineMercer County Court of Common Pleas· 1973-12-31
- Anzulewicz v. AnzulewiczMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-05-08
- Dyke v. DykeErie County Court Common Pleas· 1986-05-08
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Commonwealth v. DillworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-03· cited 60×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-11-18· cited 54×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goldman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-14· cited 50×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Weston v. WestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-09-12· cited 46×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Nedzwecky v. NedzweckySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-04-14· cited 34×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Miller v. DillworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-12-08· cited 22×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Leider v. LeiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-05-28· cited 19×
- Commonwealth ex rel. O'Brien v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-28· cited 18×
Other cases named Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hall v. Hall
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.