Skip to main content
· 12/13/2010

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 728 F. Supp. 2d 768
  • 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1627
  • 106 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7333
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130814
  • 2010 WL 5059718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the individual mandate “is, in form and substance, a penalty as opposed to a tax”
  • noting that “every application of Commerce Clause power found to be constitutionally sound by the Supreme Court involved some form of action, transaction, or deed placed in motion by an individual or legal entity”; then proceeding to strike down the individual mandate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry E. Hudson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.