· 2/22/2011
Mead v. Holder
Citations
- 766 F. Supp. 2d 16
- 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1830
- 107 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1006
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18592
- 2011 WL 611139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Court concludes that Congress did not intend [the individual mandate] to operate as a tax, and therefore Defendants cannot rely on the General Welfare Clause as authority for its enactment.”
- “[E]very federal court must satisfy itself of its own subject matter jurisdiction[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gladys Kessler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.