Skip to main content
· 2/22/2011

Mead v. Holder

Citations

  • 766 F. Supp. 2d 16
  • 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1830
  • 107 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1006
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18592
  • 2011 WL 611139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Court concludes that Congress did not intend [the individual mandate] to operate as a tax, and therefore Defendants cannot rely on the General Welfare Clause as authority for its enactment.”
  • “[E]very federal court must satisfy itself of its own subject matter jurisdiction[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gladys Kessler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.