In Re IAC/InterActive Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a distribution of subsidiary shares “is not a stock dividend”
• stating that the standard is preponderance of the evidence
• stating “[t]he proposed spin- off [wa]s not a stock dividend” or a “distribution of stock in [the parent company] that would otherwise be paid as a cash dividend”
• “[T]he plaintiff in the [18-110] Action[] bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it is entitled to relief.”
• “[T]he plaintiff in the [18-110] Action[ ] bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it is entitled to relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).