Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Citations

  • 33 A.3d 122
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 256
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3758
  • 2011 WL 5937983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “claims not raised in the trial court may not be raised for the first time on appeal.”
  • stating that “claims not raised in the trial court may not be raised for the first time on appeal.”
  • noting that it is “black letter law in this jurisdiction that an appellate court cannot consider anything which is not part of the record in the case.”
  • emphasizing that search warrants should not be invalidated by hypertechnical interpretations
  • stating that the requirement for specificity in a warrant has not been strictly construed, but has been historically tempered by the rule that search warrants should be read in a common sense fashion and should not be invalidated by hypertechnical interpretations
  • declining to reach merits of appellant’s issue where it was deemed waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Donohue, Freedberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.