Skip to main content

Colorado General Assembly v. Lamm

Citations

  • 700 P.2d 508
  • 1985 Colo. LEXIS 436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whatever inherent power the Governor has over administering the state budget, it does not extend to contradicting major legislative determinations
  • recognizing the general assembly’s legally protected interest in its appropriations power derived from various constitutional and statutory provisions
  • relying on Pensioners Protective Ass'n v. Davis, 112 Colo. 535, 150 P.2d 974 (1944)
  • recognizing legislature's plenary power over appropriations
  • recognizing legislature's plenary power over appropriations
  • the general assembly had standing to challenge the governor on the basis that he was exercising a legislative function in violation of the state constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirshbaum, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Colorado General Assembly v. Lamm

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.