Collins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Implicit in the rule is a requirement that the statement be contemporaneous or nearly contemporaneous with the event described so that there is no time to fabricate the statement.”
• Miranda warnings are unnecessary and superfluous where counsel for defendant is present and defendant has been given an adequate opportunity to consult with counsel prior to the giving of any statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bethel
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-10-04· cited 229×
• Desmond v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-11-14· cited 144×
• George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden and Charles M. Oberly, III
  Third Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 79×
• Campbell v. Burris
  Third Circuit· 2008-02-14· cited 69×
• Duross v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-06-13· cited 50×
• Culp v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-02-21· cited 33×
• People v. Mounts
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-01-16· cited 24×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-03-05· cited 24×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-07-25· cited 17×
• Keller v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-01-05· cited 14×
• State v. Vos
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2007-06-21· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-11-05· cited 9×
• Kirk v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-12-23· cited 6×
• Malin v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-06-17· cited 5×
• Pressey v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-08-02· cited 2×
• Quill v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-09-12
• State v. Bishop
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2009-02-12
• Ryan v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-04-18

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Hutto v. Ross
  Supreme Court· 1976-11-01· cited 321×
• Lockridge v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1975-12-08· cited 45×
• Rivera v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1976-01-12· cited 36×
• Jacob J. Frohmann v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1967-08-24· cited 35×
• United States v. Smith
  Third Circuit· 1953-08-17· cited 28×
• Mayor and Council of Wilmington v. Dukes
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1960-02-10· cited 26×
• Harris v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1972-05-12· cited 26×
• Fuentes v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1975-11-25· cited 25×
• United States v. Thevis
  D. Connecticut· 1979-03-30· cited 24×
• Emil Klamert v. Hoyt Cupp, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-12-28· cited 20×
• Pepe v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1961-05-10· cited 15×
• United States v. Joseph Falcone and Joseph Curreri
  Second Circuit· 1976-11-01· cited 11×
• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1976-07-02· cited 10×
• Outlaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1974-10-11· cited 4×
• Tucker v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1963-01-03· cited 4×
• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1973-03-06· cited 3×
• Mikulovsky v. Schubert
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1976-07-09· cited 2×