Duross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that reviewing court needs information about counsel's strategic choices, for which the trial record is usually inadequate
• noting that this Court cannot adequately consider an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim without a complete record concerning trial counsel’s investigation and preparation for trial
• observing that motions for post-conviction relief afford “proper review” of ineffective assistance claims
• observing that motions for post-conviction relief afford “proper review” of ineffective assistance claims
• explaining Strickland’s two part test governing ineffective assistance of counsel claims
• “The rationale for this rule arises from the reviewing Court’s need to have before it a complete record on the question of counsel’s alleged incompetency, as determined in an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).