Skip to main content

Coleman v. State

Citations

  • 466 So. 2d 395
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if the explanation given is only arguably reasonable, or if there is any evidence which places it in doubt, the motion for judgment of acquittal should not be granted
  • holding that if the explanation given is only arguably reasonable, or if there is any evidence which places it in doubt, the motion for judgment of acquittal should not be granted
  • jury “was entitled to conclude that appellant’s explanation was unsatisfactory” because, among other things, “his credibility was impeached by his admission that he had been convicted of three prior felonies”
  • “[T]he rule is that where a defendant gives a patently reasonable explanation for his possession of recently stolen goods which is totally unrefuted, and there is no other evidence of guilt, the court must direct a judgment of acquittal.”
  • “Appellant, whose credibility was impeached by his admission that he had been convicted of three prior felonies, was found trying to sell the stolen items just a few hours after they had been stolen.... The jury was entitled to conclude that appellant’s explanation was unsatisfactory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.