Patten v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction of grand theft without regard to whether defendant \was the actual one to `take' the items\
• \The question as to whether appellant knew the items were stolen is a jury question once the state proves the appellant was in possession of the recently stolen property.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haugabrook v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-11· cited 20×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-13· cited 19×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-09· cited 18×
• Interest of D.N. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-04· cited 18×
• Patten v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-07· cited 8×
• Bertone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 8×
• Neals v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06· cited 3×
• Sampson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-30· cited 2×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-11· cited 1×
• DN v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-04

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hendrix v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 329×
• Coleman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-27· cited 26×
• Pilgrim v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-26· cited 11×
• Dawkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-11· cited 7×
• Colvin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-21· cited 6×