State v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that State’s traverse “set out certain ‘disputed’ facts which [were] irrelevant and inadmissible at trial ... and which d[id] not effectively traverse the appellee’s motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ridley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 49×
• State v. Hunwick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-29· cited 32×
• Coleman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-27· cited 26×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-09· cited 18×
• Vanhoosen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-29· cited 10×
• State v. Hargrove
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-15· cited 6×
• State v. Gensler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-05· cited 5×
• State v. Fadden
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-31· cited 2×
• State v. Cisneros
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-01· cited 1×
• Vengoechea v. City of Sweetwater
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-01
• W.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. West
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-05-19· cited 39×
• Edwards v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-31· cited 14×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-04· cited 9×
• Sands v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-14· cited 1×