Coleman v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a restricted road located inside a federal enclave was a \highway\ within the definition of Code § 46.2-100
• classifying a minimally-restricted road within a federal enclave as a highway
• where a federal enclave is “open to the public,” the presence of an access gate for “checking in and out” of the enclave did not preclude the road from being a highway under the habitual offender statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Campbell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-11-19· cited 47×
• Kim v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2017-04-13· cited 19×
• Mitchell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-11-10· cited 11×
• United States v. Rodney T. Hill
  Fourth Circuit· 2007-01-10· cited 5×
• United States v. Daniels
  E.D. Virginia· 2007-01-25· cited 2×
• United States v. Spencer
  E.D. Virginia· 2005-07-26· cited 1×
• United States v. Spencer
  E.D. Virginia· 2005-04-29
• United States v. Hill
  Fourth Circuit· 2007-01-10

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-10-06· cited 232×
• United States v. Kenneth L. Kiliz
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-12-14· cited 46×
• Furman v. Call
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1987-11-25· cited 39×
• Kay Management Co., Inc. v. Creason
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1980-02-29· cited 32×
• United States v. Watson
  E.D. Virginia· 1948-09-10· cited 19×
• United States v. Barner
  N.D. California· 1961-05-18· cited 17×
• Tracey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-10-02· cited 9×