Kay Management Co., Inc. v. Creason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \ways on private property that are open to public use for vehicular travel\ could also be highways under the statute
• holding that “ways on private property that are open to public use for vehicular travel” could also be highways
• holding that roadway within apartment complex was a highway within the meaning of Code § 46.1-1(10
• holding that “evidence of accessibility to the public for free and unrestricted use [gives] rise to a prima facie presumption” that privately owned property is a “highway” for law enforcement purposes
• holding that “the evidence of accessibility to the public for free and unrestricted use gave rise to a prima facie presumption that the streets of [the apartment complex] were highways within the definition of [the Virginia Code].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).