Skip to main content
· 1/10/2007

United States v. Rodney T. Hill

Citations

  • 473 F.3d 112
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 451
  • 2007 WL 60871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a factual finding is only clearly erroneous if the reviewing court is “left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed after reviewing the entire record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Shedd, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.