Coleman v. B.G. Sulzle, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff had stated a claim for personal liability against the defendant under § 1981 where he alleged that the defendant had played a role “in the decision making process leading up to [his] termination”
• noting “the Second Circuit’s ‘broad view of the application of the continuing violation doctrine to statutory remedies other than Title VII [,]’ such as section 1983” (quoting Oteri-Harkins v. City of New York, No. 97-CV-2309, 1998 WL 817689, at (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 1998)
• continuing violation doctrine is applicable to Section 1981 claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).