Indiana Court of Appeals· 7/2/2003
Cole v. State
Citations
- 790 N.E.2d 1049
- 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1201
- 2003 WL 21508398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[i]t does not shock the public conscience to penalize more harshly those harms that may be more pervasive yet difficult to detect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Sullivan, Darden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bivins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 207×
- State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-23· cited 96×
- Person v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-02-20· cited 46×
- Teer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-11-09· cited 29×
- Farrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-22· cited 27×
- Whitney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 26×
- Pritscher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-12-31· cited 26×
- Holden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-05-30· cited 16×
- Goebel v. Blocks & Marbles Brand Toys, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-03-12· cited 16×
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-04-10· cited 16×
- Indiana State Ethics Commission v. NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-01-24· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.