Skip to main content

Farrell v. State

Citations

  • 622 N.E.2d 488
  • 1993 Ind. LEXIS 156
  • 1993 WL 421869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that ten months was not too long on the facts of that case
  • providing that where defendants have been unable to show more than late hours and an adverse verdict, courts have been reluctant to reverse a conviction
  • noting victim's \detailed description\ of perpetrator was consistent before and after looking at photo array and victim made in-court identification of defendant
  • noting victim's \detailed description\ of perpetrator was consistent before and after looking at photo array and victim made in-court identification of defendant
  • declining to rule on the admissibility of such testimony on retrial, noting that the issue should be resolved under the pending Indiana Rules of Evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krahulik, Shepard, Debruler, Dickson, Givan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.