District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/10/2001
Harris v. State
Citations
- 790 So. 2d 1246
- 2001 WL 904213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that police officer lacked probable cause to seize film canister under plain feel doctrine where officer testified that he was unsure whether film cannister contained cocaine; the officer must be reasonably certain object is contraband
- concluding that police officer lacked probable cause to seize film canister under plain feel doctrine where officer testified that he was unsure whether film cannister contained cocaine; the officer must be reasonably certain object is contraband
- stating that officer must have probable cause to believe that item found during pat-down contains contraband before conducting more thorough search to retrieve it
- noting probable cause arises where an officer feels an object that he or she is “reasonably certain . . . is contraband”
- seizure of film canister containing cocaine from defendant's front pocket not justified by plain feel doctrine where officer had nothing but mere suspicion that object he felt was contraband
- seizure of film canister containing cocaine from defendant’s front pocket not justified by plain feel doctrine where officer had nothing but mere suspicion that object he felt was contraband
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. J.D.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-10· cited 13×
- C.A.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 8×
- Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 5×
- Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-02· cited 3×
- CAM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. JDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-10
- T.T., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-29
- State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-13
- State of Florida v. Devin Shawn DenoncourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-12-27
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Ex Rel. AdministratorSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 341×
- Doctor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-12· cited 99×
- Campuzano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-08· cited 16×
- Jordan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03· cited 14×
- Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-10· cited 12×
- State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-28· cited 11×
- State v. BellamyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-15· cited 8×
- Smalls v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-03· cited 5×
- Ratcliff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-09· cited 5×
- Howell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-03· cited 4×
- Boydell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.