ARCE v. STATE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• condemning intentional segregation and the creation of racially-identifiable schools practiced by the Columbus, Ohio Board of Education
• once court orders desegregation remedy, \[e]ach instance of a failure or refusal to fulfill this affirmative duty continues the violation of the Fourteenth Amendment\
• once court orders desegregation remedy, “[e]ach instance of a failure or refusal to fulfill this affirmative duty continues the violation of the Fourteenth Amendment”
• foreseeable effect of decision is “one of the several kinds of proofs from which an inference of segregative intent may properly be drawn”
• school board actions which result in racial segregation violate equal protection, even though racial segregation was not mandated by state statute
• residential segregation is a vestige of de jure school segregation if the school board's actions were a \contributing cause\ of residential segregation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).