LeDuc v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court should only strike “unduly prejudicial” material
• finding president of foreign corporation subject to specific personal jurisdiction on account of allegedly fraudulent statements made in capacity as president
• stating motions to strike may be 13 granted if “it is clear that the subject matter to be stricken could have no possible bearing 14 on the subject matter of the litigation.”
• “Where allegations, when read with the 15 complaint as a whole, give a full understanding thereof, they need not be stricken.”
• “Motions to strike are generally not granted unless it is clear that the matter to be 11 stricken could have no possible bearing on the subject matter of the litigation.”
• “[A]llegations 15 supplying background or historical material” or allegations that, “when read with the complaint as 16 a whole, give a full understanding thereof,” need not be stricken under Rule 12(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).