Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 7/18/1983

Coker v. Amoco Oil Co.

Citations

  • 709 F.2d 1433
  • 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 702
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 77
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25750
  • 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the burden of proving that the joinder of nonresident defendants was fraudulent rests on the removing party
  • applying the plain error standard of review where the objecting party failed to make a timely objection
  • “removing party must show ... that there is no possibility that the plaintiff would be able to establish a cause of action”
  • if the state court could find that “the complaint states a cause of action,” joinder is proper
  • in addressing the issue of fraudulent joinder, the court must resolve all questions of fact and controlling law in favor of the plaintiff
  • plaintiff need only have a possibility of stating a valid cause of action in order for the joinder to be legitimate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Johnson, Tjoflat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.