Triggs v. John Crump Toyota, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an action may nevertheless be removable if the joinder of the non-diverse party . . . were fraudulent”
• noting that, ceteris paribus, a “lack of complete diversity ... would preclude removal of the case to federal court”
• explaining that joinder is legitimate even if the plaintiff presents only a “possibility of stating a valid cause of action” against the defendant
• noting that “[f]raudulent joinder is a judicially created doctrine that provides an exception to the requirement of complete diversity”
• explaining that joinder is legitimate even if the plaintiff presents only a “possibility of stating a valid cause of action” against the defendant
• noting that \[f]raudulent joinder is a judicially cre- ated doctrine that provides an exception to the requirement of com- plete diversity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).