James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, under Pennsylvania law, employees may be liable for their own fraud and misrepresentations \even if these actions were taken in the course of their employment\
• noting that removal statutes “are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts should be resolved in favor of remand.”
• explaining that, in non-CAFA cases, courts must strictly construe the removal provisions and resolve all doubts in favor of remand
• explaining that, in non-CAFA cases, courts must strictly construe the removal provisions and resolve all doubts in favor of remand
• explaining that, in non-CAFA cases, courts must strictly construe the removal provisions and resolve all doubts in favor of remand
• explaining that removal statutes “are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts should be resolved in favor of remand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).