District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 8/31/1983
Cohen v. Owens & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 464 A.2d 904
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no appellate review where claims still pending “unless the trial court follows Rule 54(b) to the letter and makes the necessary certification_”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nebeker, Pryor, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McKethean v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-03-29· cited 101×
- Nickens v. Labor Agency of Metropolitan WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-13· cited 60×
- Graff v. MalawerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-11· cited 43×
- Roberts-Douglas v. MearesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-11-03· cited 35×
- Canterbury Riding Condominium v. Chesapeake Investors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-10· cited 30×
- Stein v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-15· cited 23×
- Herbin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-09-26· cited 17×
- District of Columbia v. Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-10· cited 15×
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. OxendineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-25· cited 14×
- Tharp v. Disabled American Veterans Department of Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-29· cited 13×
- 1st Atlantic Guaranty Corp. v. TillersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-01-25· cited 13×
- Read v. LeggDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-06-13· cited 13×
- Word v. HamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-07-17· cited 12×
- Peoples v. Warfield & Sanford, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-06-26· cited 10×
- Jones v. American Express Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-12-21· cited 7×
- District of Columbia v. PizzulliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-02-08· cited 5×
- Barry v. LittleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-18· cited 3×
- Riddick v. William M. Sinclair Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-09-25· cited 2×
- Paden v. GallowayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-12-07
- Garcia v. TygierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-06-01
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 1,545×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court· 1976-03-23· cited 988×
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court· 1946-01-02· cited 481×
- Acha v. BeameSecond Circuit· 1978-01-12· cited 155×
- Manuel Gomez v. Maurice T. Turner, Jr., Chief of PoliceD.C. Circuit· 1982-02-26· cited 97×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. GiesowSecond Circuit· 1969-06-17· cited 84×
- Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Seventh Circuit· 1942-06-01· cited 48×
- Gray Line Motor Tours, Inc., and Toye Bros. Airport Service, Inc. v. City of New OrleansFifth Circuit· 1974-08-05· cited 42×
- Vale Properties, Ltd. v. Canterbury Tales, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-18· cited 41×
- Dyhouse v. BaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-24· cited 20×
- C. J. Wieland & Son Dairy Products Co. v. WickardE.D. Wisconsin· 1945-02-20· cited 16×
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-05-05· cited 12×
- Metropolitan Baptist Church, Inc. v. MinkoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-06-16· cited 8×
- United States v. 720 Bottles Labeled 2 Fl. Oz. Plantation Pure Vanilla ExtractE.D. New York· 1944-05-13· cited 8×
- Dixon v. AM General Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-05· cited 7×
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Carll & Ramagosa, Inc.Third Circuit· 1966-08-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.