Canterbury Riding Condominium v. Chesapeake Investors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in reviewing the propriety of certification under Rule 2-602(b), \[a] factor to be considered is that the determination of the remaining count before the trial court might utterly moot the need for the review now being sought\
• Rule 2-602(b) is to be reserved for “the very infrequent harsh case.”
• in reviewing the propriety of certification under Rule 2-602(b), “[a] factor to be considered is that the determination of the remaining count before the trial court might utterly moot the need for the review now 7 being sought”
• “Although we stop short of adding any rigid requirement, ... when a trial judge certifies a case as final under Rule 2-602, we nonetheless find it more difficult to affirm the exercise of discretion where no reasons for that exercise are given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).