Skip to main content
· 5/18/1981

Vale Properties, Ltd. v. Canterbury Tales, Inc.

Citations

  • 431 A.2d 11
  • 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court may deny motion to intervene under Rule 24(a)(2) “when an existing party seeks the same ultimate objective as the [absent party]”
  • trial court may deny motion to intervene under Rule 24(a)(2) \when an existing party seeks the same ultimate objective as the [absent party]\
  • trial court may deny motion to intervene under Rule 24(a)(2) “when an existing party seeks the same ultimate objective as the [absent party]”
  • intervention would have required “an especially wasteful and duplicative expenditure of judicial resources”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kern, Harris, Ferren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.