Cohen v. Arthur Andersen, L.L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants are entitled to a credit equaling entire settlement amount because plaintiffs did not satisfy their burden
• holding that defendants are entitled to a credit equaling entire settlement amount because plaintiffs did not satisfy their burden
• rendering judgment for accounting firm because plaintiffs’ settlement with other defendants for common damages of loss of trust assets exceeded accounting firm’s liability
• “Although the causes of action alleged are technically different, they resulted in a single injury, loss of trust assets.”
• “Although the causes of action alleged are technically different, they resulted in a single injury, loss of trust assets.”
• summary judgment appropriate where there was no fact issue “as to the existence and amount of damages … incurred with respect to the fraud claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).