Skip to main content
· 6/23/1993

El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Berryman

Citations

  • 858 S.W.2d 362
  • 1993 WL 165499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the full settlement amount had been paid to the plaintiff by one defendant, the one satisfaction rule extinguished plaintiff’s claims against second defendant
  • holding that one satisfaction rule does not allow plaintiff to recover from derivatively liable principal or alter ego when plaintiff has already received full settlement on his claim
  • holding that one satisfaction rule does not allow plaintiff to recover from derivatively liable principal or alter ego when plaintiff has already received full settlement on his claim
  • “Because we find Berryman’s claims barred by the one satisfaction rule and collateral estoppel, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the [summary] judgment of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.