Supreme Court· 10/15/1990
Coffey v. PSLJ, Inc.
Citations
- 111 S. Ct. 296
- 59 U.S.L.W. 3293
- 112 L. Ed. 2d 250
- 498 U.S. 920
- 1990 U.S. LEXIS 5266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
- “lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
- insufficient that prior art discloses components of patented device, either separately or in other combinations; “there must be some teaching, suggestion, or incentive to make the combination made by the inventor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationFederal Circuit· 1995-03-15· cited 461×
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 256×
- In Re BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation)Second Circuit· 1992-06-30· cited 191×
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. And Triangle Biomedical Equipment, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Shandon Inc. And Shandon Southern Products LimitedFederal Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 152×
- Kevin Pappas v. Middle Earth Condominium Association Castle Rock Management CompanySecond Circuit· 1992-05-08· cited 141×
- In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.E.D. New York· 1998-05-04· cited 132×
- Kaplan v. GelfondS.D. New York· 2007-01-18· cited 123×
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)S.D. New York· 1991-06-27· cited 113×
- Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1994-01-19· cited 92×
- In Re Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationS.D. New York· 1991-08-30· cited 82×
- Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc. And Met-Coil Systems CorporationFederal Circuit· 1991-11-13· cited 78×
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MartinTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1997-04-24· cited 78×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1993-12-09· cited 69×
- In Re Ethyl Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-07-14· cited 65×
- Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-08-28· cited 59×
- Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag v. Hantscho Commercial Products, Inc. And Rockwell Graphics Systems, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1994-06-01· cited 55×
- John J. Marchica v. Long Island Railroad CompanySecond Circuit· 1994-07-29· cited 54×
- In re Consolidated Parlodel LitigationD. New Jersey· 1998-02-06· cited 48×
- Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & BurkeS.D. New York· 1992-07-28· cited 45×
- Tol-O-Matic, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Proma Produkt-Und Marketing Gesellschaft M.B.H. And Norgren Co.Federal Circuit· 1991-09-26· cited 41×
Other cases named Coffey v. PSLJ, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.