Skip to main content

Cockrell v. State

Citations

  • 743 N.E.2d 799
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 414
  • 2001 WL 238632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When a conviction is reversed due to insufficient evidence, double jeopardy precludes retrial of the overturned conviction.”
  • proper method for challenging deficiencies in charging information is a motion to dismiss
  • speculation is insuffi-clent to support convictions, and if after considering evidence supporting the verdict and reasonable inferences therefrom, we conclude that no reasonable trier of fact could find each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, we may not affirm the conviction
  • speculation is insufficient to support convictions, and if after considering evidence supporting the verdict and reasonable inferences therefrom, we conclude that no reasonable trier of fact could find each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, we may not affirm the conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Sharpnack, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.