Skip to main content

Cochran v. State

Citations

  • 828 S.E.2d 338
  • 305 Ga. 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel’s withdrawal of a requested jury instruction on mere presence did not prejudice the appellant, because other instructions sufficiently covered that point
  • finding that trial counsel’s failure to present cumulative evidence through additional testimony did not amount to ineffective assistance
  • “the evidence does not have to exclude every conceivable inference or hypothesis” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • failure to subpoena officer whose testimony would have been cumulative of other testimony did not establish ineffective assistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.