Skip to main content

Lee v. State

Citations

  • 896 S.E.2d 524
  • 317 Ga. 880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this Court considers closing arguments in context; prosecutors are granted “‘wide latitude’” in closing argument and may “‘argue reasonable inferences from the evidence’”; and “‘(w
  • concluding that trial counsel was not deficient in failing to object to the prosecutor’s remarks that were permissible arguments about the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence, rather than statements about the prosecutor’s personal belief as to the veracity of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.