Skip to main content

Muhammad v. State

Citations

  • 254 S.E.2d 356
  • 243 Ga. 404
  • 1979 Ga. LEXIS 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to follow Brasfield v. United States, 272 U. S. 448 (47 SC 135, 71 LE 345) (1926
  • trial court’s refusal to give a charge on identification was not erroneous where appellant did not argue that he was incorrectly identified
  • “[T]he rule that mere presence without more is insufficient to convict is really a corollary to the requirement that the state prove each element of the offense charged.”
  • “[T]he rule that mere presence without more is insufficient to convict is really a corollary to the requirement that the state prove each element of the offense charged.”
  • where trial court correctly instructed the jury on the duty of the state to prove each and every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on “mere presence” of the accused at the scene of the crime did not constitute reversible error
  • where trial court correctly instructed the jury on the duty of the state to prove each and every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on “mere presence” of the accused at the scene of the crime did not constitute reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.