Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/20/2007

Cochran v. Norkunas

Citations

  • 919 A.2d 700
  • 398 Md. 1
  • 2007 Md. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that offeree’s silence can constitute acceptance if the offer-ee has accepted the benefit of the offer
  • indicating that offeree’s silence can constitute acceptance if the offeree has accepted the benefit of the offer
  • finding that the parties did not reach a final agreement because the letter of intent only demonstrated “an intent to memorialize the property sale through a final standard form contract”
  • identifying factors to be considered when analyzing whether the parties intended to be bound by an agreement
  • deeming letter of intent unenforceable because “language of the letter of intent does not support the Buyers’ contention that the parties had reached a final agreement.”
  • “Creation of a contract requires an offer by one party and acceptance by the other party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cochran v. Norkunas

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.