Skip to main content
· 3/23/1979

Porter v. General Boiler Casing Co.

Citations

  • 396 A.2d 1090
  • 284 Md. 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a signature is not required in order to bring a contract into existence
  • holding that a non-party may become bound by a written contract where their conduct is sufficient to manifest acceptance
  • reiterating that under Maryland law acceptance of a contract can be accomplished by acts as well as words with no formal acceptance being required
  • recognizing under Maryland law the rule that “an offer may be communicated by conduct or by words, but must be communicated”
  • indicating that a non-signatory can be bound by a contract because of his actions even when he does not sign the con- tract
  • determining that summary judgment was inappropriate where a material issue of fact existed as to whether a parties’ conduct clearly manifested an intention to accept and to be bound by the terms of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.