Skip to main content
· 2/1/2007

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Potomac Investment Properties, Incorporated

Citations

  • 476 F.3d 231
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2238
  • 2007 WL 273486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Only an unambiguous writing justifies summary judgment without resort to extrinsic evidence, and no writing is unambiguous if susceptible to two reasonable interpretations.”
  • “If a court properly determines that the contract is unambiguous on the dispositive issue, it may then properly interpret the contract as a matter of law and grant summary judgment because no interpretive facts are in genuine issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, King, Shedd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.