District of Columbia· 9/9/2004
Cobell v. Norton
Citations
- 224 F.R.D. 1
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18042
- 2004 WL 2008937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “scandalous” statements are those which “un- necessarily reflect[] on the moral character of an individual or state[] anything in repulsive language that detracts from the dignity of the court” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- noting 8 that, for the purposes of Rule 12(f), affidavits and declarations may also be considered 9 “pleadings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2004-10-22· cited 207×
- Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. HilleryN.D. California· 2009-08-26· cited 52×
- Williams v. ChuDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-13· cited 48×
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-04· cited 32×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pointe Physical Therapy, LLCE.D. Michigan· 2015-05-27· cited 18×
- Dentons US LLP v. Republic of GuineaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-25· cited 12×
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-26· cited 11×
- Arunachalam v. IBMFederal Circuit· 2021-03-01· cited 10×
- Hunt v. Steffensen (In re Steffensen)D. Utah· 2014-05-23· cited 8×
- QUATELA v. Stryker Corp.N.D. California· 2010-12-17· cited 6×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2005-06-17· cited 5×
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-25
- Nugent v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2010-11-24
- Williams v. BodmanDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-13
- Jackson v. Starbucks CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-07
- Doe 1 v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-13
- Doe 1 v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict of Columbia· 2023-01-03
- District of Columbia International Public Charter School v. LemusDistrict of Columbia· 2023-03-27
- Khan v. Department of Homeland Security (Dhs)District of Columbia· 2024-09-12
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court· 1981-12-14· cited 429×
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Second Circuit· 1976-12-01· cited 322×
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 265×
- Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 1961-01-17· cited 168×
- In Re 2TheMart. Com, Inc. Securities LitigationC.D. California· 2000-07-17· cited 93×
- Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1980-05-08· cited 74×
- Stewart v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia· 1982-05-06· cited 51×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
- Johnson v. McDow (In Re Johnson)District of Columbia· 1999-07-20· cited 43×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 1998-05-28· cited 39×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-02-22· cited 33×
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict of Columbia· 2003-04-14· cited 32×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-14· cited 18×
- Mitchell v. Bendix Corp.N.D. Indiana· 1985-02-21· cited 10×
- Humane Society of the United States v. BabbittD.C. Circuit· 1995-02-14· cited 10×
- Gateway Bottling, Inc. v. Dad's Rootbeer Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-11-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.