Johnson v. McDow (In Re Johnson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if the lower court’s factual findings are plausible in light of the record, the reviewing court may not reverse those factual findings even if it would have weighed the evidence differently
• striking as scandalous allegations that bankruptcy trustee was a “liar” because they were “so devoid of necessary evidence ... that they amount to little more than name-calling”
• discussing with approval a party’s use of the rule’s language to “reinforce his argument for the use of” the court’s inherent power
• “The standard of review concerning a Bankruptcy Court’s denial of sanctions is abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).