District of Columbia· 11/12/2002
Cobell v. Norton
Citations
- 211 F.R.D. 7
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21728
- 2002 WL 31513600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The purpose of Rule 11 “is to protect the court from frivolous and baseless filings that are not well grounded, or brought with the purpose of vexatiously multiplying the proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-26· cited 103×
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-24· cited 43×
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-04· cited 32×
- Stankevich v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia· 2016-01-15· cited 9×
- Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-07-02· cited 7×
- Green v. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial OrganizationsDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-28· cited 6×
- Son Ly v. Solin, Inc.District of Columbia· 2012-12-17· cited 6×
- Green v. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (Afl-Cio)District of Columbia· 2009-09-28
- Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. SolomanDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-30
- Williams v. Romarm S.A.District of Columbia· 2020-04-01
- Carmichael v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-25
- Pincus Hueter v. KruseDistrict of Columbia· 2022-06-18
- Thomas v. Bank of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-09
- Petruss Media Group, LLC v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-25
- Colella v. AndrousDistrict of Columbia· 2024-03-22
- Merchia v. Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc.District of Columbia· 2024-12-20
- Johnson v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2026-03-31
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Scott J. Rafferty, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nynex Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsD.C. Circuit· 1995-10-18· cited 81×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-14· cited 18×
- Long v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2002-04-30· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.