Skip to main content
· 10/18/1995

Scott J. Rafferty, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nynex Corporation, Appellees/cross-Appellants

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 844
  • 314 U.S. App. D.C. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the 1993 64 amendment to Rule 11 that permits, rather than directs, a court to impose sanctions upon finding a rule violation
  • “Unless a government consent decree stipulates that it may be enforced by a third party beneficiary, only the parties to the decree can seek enforcement of it.”
  • bias could not be inferred from “court delays in ruling on pending motions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Sentelle, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.