District of Columbia· 8/10/1999
Cobell v. Babbitt
Citations
- 188 F.R.D. 122
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12387
- 1999 WL 607188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a near ‘but for’ relationship where court ordered fees “caused by defendants’ failure to obey” discovery orders
- awarding attorney’s fees as a contempt sanction where defendants “proposed a clear and unambiguous order for this court’s signature” but then proceeded to violate the order once it was signed
- assessing reasonable attorneys’ fees against defendants for civil contempt of court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 265×
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-12· cited 52×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2005-12-19· cited 41×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-12· cited 41×
- Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District of Columbia· 2008-03-04· cited 31×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-17· cited 23×
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict of Columbia· 2014-06-04· cited 20×
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-31· cited 19×
- Woodland v. Viacom Inc.District of Columbia· 2008-11-25· cited 15×
- Miller v. HolzmannD.C. Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 8×
- Fonville v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-14· cited 5×
- Alvarado v. Rainbow Inn, Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-11-19· cited 5×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2004-05-27· cited 4×
- Azamar v. Stern Enterprises, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-12-19· cited 4×
- Walker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-05-12· cited 4×
- Woodland v. Viacom Inc.District of Columbia· 2008-11-24· cited 1×
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2016-12-06· cited 1×
- Martinez v. Asian 328, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2016-04-27
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-12-06
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborD.C. Circuit· 1980-09-02· cited 989×
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 402×
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 317×
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1985-08-20· cited 268×
- Weisberg v. WebsterD.C. Circuit· 1984-12-07· cited 69×
- Turnbull v. WilckenTenth Circuit· 1990-01-03· cited 59×
- Stephen D. Zook, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph T. Brown, William v. Mosher and Champaign County, Cross-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1989-01-17· cited 45×
- In Re Oliver L. North (Gadd Fee Application)D.C. Circuit· 1994-01-07· cited 34×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-02-22· cited 33×
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. ReillyD.C. Circuit· 1993-07-13· cited 19×
- Jones v. ClintonE.D. Arkansas· 1999-07-29· cited 12×
- Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film, Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-07-21· cited 6×
- Shepherd v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District of Columbia· 1994-09-13· cited 4×
- Kennecott Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1986-11-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.