· 10/30/2009
CMK DEVELOPMENT v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 917 N.E.2d 1155
- 335 Ill. Dec. 91
- 395 Ill. App. 3d 830
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the duty to defend is “much broader” than the duty to indemnify
- holding the duty to defend is “much broader” than the duty to indemnify
- rejecting the argument that damage to bathroom fixtures that occurred after sale created damage in the property of others so as to trigger coverage because those fixtures were “part of the structure the developer promised to deliver”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert E. Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.