Skip to main content
· 6/26/2012

Lagestee-Mulder, Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance

Citations

  • 682 F.3d 1054
  • 2012 WL 2382470
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an insurance company “must defend its insured in actions that are even potentially within coverage”
  • “The factual allegations of the complaint determine whether there is a duty to defend.”
  • “Where the underlying suit alleges damage to the construction project itself because of a construction defect, there is no coverage. By contrast, where the complaint alleges that a construction defect damaged something other than the project, coverage exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.