Skip to main content
· 7/12/1985

Clutterham v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 169 Cal. App. 3d 1223
  • 215 Cal. Rptr. 795
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 164
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no triable issue of fact where employee failed to submit evidence to contradict employer’s showing that termination was necessitated by market conditions and company reorganization
  • same holding as to corporate judgment to reorganize and eliminate plaintiff's position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ashby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.