Clutterham v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no triable issue of fact where employee failed to submit evidence to contradict employer’s showing that termination was necessitated by market conditions and company reorganization
• same holding as to corporate judgment to reorganize and eliminate plaintiff's position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 Inclusive
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-10-30· cited 186×
• Coelho v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-06-28· cited 167×
• Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-11-11· cited 145×
• Binder v. Aetna Life Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-10-14· cited 119×
• Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1998-01-05· cited 112×
• Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-11-25· cited 75×
• Sanchez v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-06-27· cited 56×
• Burton v. Security Pacific Nat. Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-01-19· cited 42×
• Taylor v. National Life Insurance
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-17· cited 38×
• Fowler v. Varian Associates, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-11-09· cited 37×
• Telesphere Intern., Inc. v. Scollin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-06· cited 23×
• Gus Joanou James Beeler v. The Coca-Cola Company Does I Through Xxv, Andy L. Fisher v. The Coca-Cola Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-06-07· cited 22×
• Havill v. Woodstock Soapstone Co.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-18· cited 22×
• Cox v. Resilient Flooring Division of Congoleum Corp.
  C.D. California· 1986-06-13· cited 18×
• Harlan v. Sohio Petroleum Co.
  N.D. California· 1988-01-14· cited 12×
• Linn v. Beneficial Commercial Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-04-04· cited 12×
• Hoy v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  N.D. California· 1994-03-07· cited 9×
• Lemnitzer v. Philippine Airlines, Inc.
  N.D. California· 1992-11-10· cited 6×
• Beale v. GTE CALIFORNIA
  C.D. California· 1996-10-24· cited 4×
• Burton v. Security Pacific National Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-01-19· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-02-27· cited 263×
• Wallis v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-10-16· cited 108×
• Angelo Gianaculas Ernest Buck and James Gregg v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., a Corporation, AKA Twa, Defendants
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-05-24· cited 58×
• Crosier v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-12-28· cited 46×
• Hepp v. Lockheed-California Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-11-27· cited 39×