Skip to main content
· 8/10/1988

Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.

Citations

  • 203 Cal. App. 3d 743
  • 250 Cal. Rptr. 195
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 945
  • 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[c]are must be taken ... not to interfere with the legitimate exercise of managerial discretion____ [T]he employer must of necessity be allowed substantial scope for the exercise of subjective judgment”
  • “[I]n an action for breach of ‘satisfaction contract,’ the jury’s role is limited to deciding whether the employer’s dissatisfaction is bona fide.”
  • \The employer does not ... have a right to make an arbitrary or unreasonable decision about terminating an employee when there is a contract to terminate only for good cause.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry-Deal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.