Martha C. Kamm, a Widow v. California City Development Company, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting denial of discovery where discovery is necessary to determine propriety || of class action is an abuse of discretion
• affirming order striking 15 class allegations where plaintiff would be unable to meet requirements of Rule 23
• affirming order striking class 12 allegations where plaintiff would be unable to meet requirements of Rule 23
• affirming order striking 22 class allegations where plaintiff would be unable to meet requirements of Rule 23
• interlocutory appeal was authorized in November, 1973, the court of appeals ruled on the interlocutory appeal in January, 1975
• “The propriety of a class 9 action cannot be determined in some cases without discovery[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).