Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 9/24/1992

Clayton v. State

Citations

840 P.2d 18
1992 OK CR 60
63 O.B.A.J. 2803
1992 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
1992 WL 236611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding booking questions did not require Miranda warning because \questions certainly were not the kind which the detective should know were reasonably likely to elicit incriminating statements\
finding booking questions did not require Miranda warning because \questions certainly were not the kind which the detective should know were reasonably likely to elicit incriminating statements\
upholding trial court’s decision to submit correct verdict form to jury for consideration in sentencing phase of capital murder trial after jury noticed first verdict form listed incorrect aggravating circumstances
upholding trial court’s decision to submit correct verdict form to jury for consideration in sentencing phase of capital murder trial after jury noticed first verdict form listed incorrect aggravating circumstances
feasibility hearing and jury trial on competency held six years after trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parks, Lane, Lumpkin, Brett, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.