Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 12/22/1999

Clayton v. Gibson

Citations

  • 199 F.3d 1162
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 33589
  • 1999 WL 1256322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \'routine booking questions do not constitute interrogation because they do not normally elicit incriminating responses'\
  • noting that a cumulative error argument “does not merit review given the lack of any discernible constitutional error”
  • emphasizing that prior medical opinions regarding petitioner's competency are \perhaps most important\
  • emphasizing that prior medical opinions regarding petitioner’s competency are “perhaps most important”
  • noting that factors relevant to a competency determination include “defendant’s demeanor at trial, any evidence of irrational behavior by defendant, and perhaps most important, any prior medical opinions regarding competency.”
  • finding no doubt as to petitioner's competency at the time of trial where counsel declined to express \serious\ concerns about his client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Briscoe, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Clayton v. Gibson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.