Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 510 A.2d 243
  • 306 Md. 483
  • 1986 Md. LEXIS 243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the case before us, however, the State has failed to file a cross-petition [raising the] issue” and “we will not consider it”
  • “counsel’s effectiveness is impaired by action of the court or the state placing a marked restraint upon counsel’s tactical or strategic judgment”
  • \counsel's effectiveness is impaired by action of the court or the state placing a marked restraint upon counsel's tactical or strategic judgment\
  • order restricting attorneys for co-defendants from consulting during peremptory strikes denied effective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.