Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/26/1986
Clark v. State
Citations
- 510 A.2d 243
- 306 Md. 483
- 1986 Md. LEXIS 243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the case before us, however, the State has failed to file a cross-petition [raising the] issue” and “we will not consider it”
- “counsel’s effectiveness is impaired by action of the court or the state placing a marked restraint upon counsel’s tactical or strategic judgment”
- \counsel's effectiveness is impaired by action of the court or the state placing a marked restraint upon counsel's tactical or strategic judgment\
- order restricting attorneys for co-defendants from consulting during peremptory strikes denied effective assistance of counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-01· cited 98×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-22· cited 91×
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-12· cited 58×
- State v. ColvinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-14· cited 54×
- State v. BrobergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-23· cited 44×
- Wooten-Bey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-03· cited 27×
- Goren v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-06· cited 9×
- Brewer v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-08· cited 7×
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-08-27· cited 6×
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-09· cited 5×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 1,182×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 601×
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1961-03-27· cited 363×
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-03· cited 103×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-09-09· cited 91×
- Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-03-23· cited 88×
- State v. TichnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-06-09· cited 76×
- Warrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 43×
- Dean v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-08· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.