· 6/9/1986
State v. Tichnell
Citations
- 509 A.2d 1179
- 306 Md. 428
- 1986 Md. LEXIS 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]here is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights”
- holding that “[tjhere is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights”
- defense counsel’s strategy and information available to him showed that failure to conduct additional investigation was not unreasonable
- defense counsel's strategy and information available to him showed that failure to conduct additional investigation was not unreasonable
- \ There is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights....\
- no distinction between right guaranteed under federal constitution and the right to counsel ensured by Article 21
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.