Skip to main content
· 6/9/1986

State v. Tichnell

Citations

  • 509 A.2d 1179
  • 306 Md. 428
  • 1986 Md. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]here is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights”
  • holding that “[tjhere is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights”
  • defense counsel’s strategy and information available to him showed that failure to conduct additional investigation was not unreasonable
  • defense counsel's strategy and information available to him showed that failure to conduct additional investigation was not unreasonable
  • \ There is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights....\
  • no distinction between right guaranteed under federal constitution and the right to counsel ensured by Article 21

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.